PART 2 – Investigators traced my son from the hospital to Wisconsin, where horrified prospective adoptive parents learned they had received a baby through fraudulent surrender papers !!
The hospital did not discharge me that day.
Partly because I was still recovering.
Partly because everyone suddenly understood that my room had become a security concern.
Martin’s chart was flagged.
Visitors required approval.
Mark was not allowed back into my room.
Wendy was denied access.
Hospital security preserved every relevant camera feed they still had.
Judy’s twenty-seven-second clip had started the emergency.
The original footage did the real evidentiary work.
There were forty-three minutes from that corridor.
Mark entering.
Wendy.
The man in navy scrubs.
The incubator.
A hospital employee opening a restricted door.
The incubator leaving.
Then the employee returning alone.
The detectives identified the man in navy scrubs within hours.
He was not a nurse.
He worked for a private neonatal transport contractor called NorthStar Medical Transit.
That mattered.
The transport itself had a dispatch record.
Vehicle number.
Driver.
Pickup time.
Destination entered into the system.
A private pediatric facility outside Chicago.
For the first time, I had an address connected to my son.
The detective warned me:
“An entered destination does not guarantee that is where he stayed.”
“I understand.”
I did not.
I just wanted them to move faster.
They were already moving.
NorthStar’s compliance officer produced the transfer request after receiving an emergency preservation demand.
The request named my son as “Baby Vance B.”
It stated that the child had been medically cleared for transfer to a receiving physician before private placement.
My signature appeared at the bottom.
Not my signature.
A rough imitation.
Mark’s signature was real.
So was Wendy’s as “family liaison.”
There was also a name I did not recognize.
Dr. Peter Sloane.
The hospital said no physician by that name had treated my babies.
The receiving pediatric facility did have a Dr. Peter Sloane on staff.
Now the case had another branch.
Was he involved?
Had his name been used?
The detectives did not assume.
Neither did I.
By evening, they had confirmed something crucial.
The pediatric facility had admitted a newborn matching my second son’s birth date and identifiers under a temporary transfer record.
He had been discharged the next morning to two prospective adoptive parents from Wisconsin.
My baby had been alive.
He had left Illinois.
I nearly tore the IV out trying to stand.
Nina caught me.
“I’m going there.”
“You just had major surgery.”
“My baby is in Wisconsin.”
“And police are going to him now.”
That sentence kept me in bed.
The prospective parents, Daniel and Claire Morrison, had not bought a baby in a back room.
That was the first major correction to what Wendy’s video made me believe.
They had applied through a private adoption facilitator called Lakeshore Family Placement months earlier.
They believed a birth mother had selected them.
They had paid agency and legal fees into escrow.
They had received documents saying the birth mother, identified under a confidentiality code, had voluntarily relinquished the child after an emergency delivery.
They had no idea I was unconscious.
No idea I had twins.
No idea the signature was false.
When officers arrived at their home, they were horrified.
Claire Morrison reportedly started crying before they finished explaining.
The baby was with them.
Alive.
Safe.
Fed.
Sleeping.
My son.
Because the legality of the placement was immediately challenged and there were medical and jurisdictional issues, officers did not simply hand the baby into a patrol car and drive five hours.
A child welfare emergency process began.
The baby was taken to a pediatric hospital for identification and medical evaluation.
DNA could confirm.
Hospital birth records could confirm.
Footprints.
Blood type.
Newborn screening.
I wanted every confirmation in the world.
By midnight, a detective came to my room.
“Mrs. Vance, the child is safe.”
I started sobbing.
Not recovered.
Not in my arms.
Safe.
That word was enough for one night.
Then came the question I had been avoiding.
“What about Mark?”
The detective was careful.
He had agreed to an interview with counsel.
He admitted signing documents.
He claimed Wendy told him they were temporary guardianship papers because I was critically ill and one twin needed specialized care.
The video contradicted part of that.
Wendy clearly said:
“Tell her the second twin was stillborn.”
Mark did not object.
He signed.
He later told me the baby died.
So whatever he believed at the first moment, he knew the lie by the time I woke.
The detective said:
“We’re still determining the full sequence and what charges are supported.”
Good.
I did not need an instant legal label.
I needed facts.
“What about Wendy?”
She had hired a lawyer and stopped speaking.
Again, her right.
No dramatic confession.
But investigators had already found financial communications.
A $48,000 transfer from an escrow company associated with Lakeshore to a consulting LLC controlled by Wendy.
Not “purchase price” written on a check.
A consulting payment.
That was worse in a more realistic way.
Money had moved through paperwork designed to look legitimate.
The prospective adoptive parents had paid substantial legal and agency fees believing they were participating in a lawful adoption.
Some of that money apparently ended up with Wendy’s company.
Mark’s accounts had not received a direct payment that investigators had found yet.
That mattered.
Maybe Wendy’s motive was money.
Maybe control.
Maybe both.
Mark’s motive looked different.
His small construction-design firm had been struggling.
Wendy had been telling him for months that two children would destroy him financially.
I learned this from recovered messages.
Wendy:
One baby is manageable. Two is catastrophe.
Mark:
Hailey would never agree.
Wendy:
Then stop acting like every decision needs unanimous approval when she’s the one not seeing the numbers.
That message made me cold.
A marriage does require consent on things like giving away a child.
Not every decision needs unanimous approval?
This one does.
My parents arrived the next morning.
My mother walked into the hospital room, saw Martin, saw me, and cried.
I had told them one twin died.
Now I had to tell them he was alive and in another state.
My father sat down slowly.
“Mark did what?”
I said:
“We don’t know every part yet.”
I was already tired of sentences like:
Mark sold the baby.
Wendy stole the baby.
The truth was horrifying enough without getting sloppy.
They had participated in moving my living newborn under fraudulent surrender paperwork and then told me he died.
That was enough.
My mother wanted to confront Wendy.
“No.”
My father wanted to call Mark.
“No.”
My family wanted action because action made helplessness easier.
I understood.
But I did not need another group of adults creating chaos around my sons.
That afternoon, the Wisconsin court entered a temporary emergency order recognizing the disputed placement and directing that the baby remain under hospital/child welfare supervision pending transfer back to the jurisdiction of birth.
The Morrisons cooperated.
Their attorney contacted mine—because by then I had one.
A family-law attorney named Rachel Kim.
Claire Morrison sent a message through counsel.
We did not know. We are so sorry.
We will do anything needed to return him safely.
I read it three times.
Then I cried for them too.
They had spent one night believing they were finally parents.
I had spent three days believing my son was dead.
Different wounds.
Same lie at the center.
Rachel said:
“You do not need to comfort them right now.”
“I know.”
But I also did not want to hate innocent people because they had held my baby.
The next morning, DNA confirmation returned.
Probability of maternity effectively conclusive.
Baby Vance B was my son.
Alive.
Mine.
The transfer back could begin.
I asked Rachel how soon.
She looked at the doctor.
The doctor looked at my incision.
Everyone looked annoyingly reasonable.
“Hailey,” Rachel said, “you are not driving to Wisconsin after emergency surgery.”
“I know.”
“You’re going to recover enough to receive him safely.”
I hated her.
She was right.
So I did the hardest thing I had done since waking.
I waited while knowing exactly where my child was.
Click here to continue reading: PART 3: Noah came back into my arms alive, while Mark admitted in writing that he knew the placement had become permanent and chose to tell me our son was dead
===============================================================================
One Comment on “PART 2 – Investigators traced my son from the hospital to Wisconsin, where horrified prospective adoptive parents learned they had received a baby through fraudulent surrender papers !!”